Tag Archives: Tesla

First Drive: The 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ Is A Beautiful Electric Porpoise

Advertisement

Image for article titled First Drive: The 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ Is A Beautiful Electric Porpoise

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Image for article titled First Drive: The 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ Is A Beautiful Electric Porpoise

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Advertisement

I Don’t Know What To Do With All This Tech

My husband used to be a sales associate at a Mercedes-Benz dealership in Montreal, and he’s spent the entire duration of our marriage telling me that no automaker is as luxuriously high-tech as Mercedes. I have never discounted this observation. I’ve just also never felt the need to drive an extremely tech-heavy car. I still have a hard time dealing with a tiny infotainment screen.

Advertisement

So I think it’s probably a little bit of an understatement to say that the EQS’s offerings are a bit overwhelming. After I laughed out loud at the exterior, I also laughed out loud at the absolutely massive Hyperscreen. I wanted to ask it if it was compensating for something. I wanted to ask why such a cute fella needs such a big screen.

Functionally, the Hyperscreen is great. A single piece of curved glass, it’s a gorgeous feat of technological innovation that works with rapid speed due to an eight-core processor and 24 gigabytes of RAM. You tap on anything, and there’s not going to be lag. You’re immediately transported to the place you chose to go in the infotainment system.

Advertisement

The graphics are also gorgeous, but again, it’s a little bit Much. There’s a screen for the driver, one of the passenger, and a tall screen in the center, and in those latter two, you can access everything from radio controls to vehicle settings to satellite maps to photo galleries to video games. I did poke around the Tetris game and found it took a while to load but was otherwise fun. I still can’t imagine myself using an infotainment screen instead of my phone for gaming, though.

Even worse, you still get a lot of glare, despite the fact that Mercedes tried its best to avoid that. There’s not really anything you’re going to be able to do about the reflection of the sun when it’s especially bright.

Advertisement

You can also navigate with conversational commands after saying, “Hey Mercedes.” As in, you can say something like, “Hey Mercedes, I want coffee,” and your car will find you the nearest coffee spots. I used to hate voice commands because it was next to impossible to actually get what you were asking for, but this modern iteration that you see on luxury cars has really changed the game. I don’t have to think up the robotic command I’d need to change the radio station. I can just say it.

The digital dashboard was also one hell of a feature. You can cycle through tons of different displays, most of which are just mind boggling. You can literally have your navigation map displayed on your dashboard — and I don’t mean you get a little box that has navigation. The whole screen turns into a map. I’m sure some folks will enjoy it, but it was massively overwhelming for me.

Advertisement

As was the augmented reality navigation, which feels a little bit more video game-y than anything else. Maybe I’m just too old to appreciate these things.

Image for article titled First Drive: The 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ Is A Beautiful Electric Porpoise

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Advertisement

The Verdict

It’s difficult to offer a verdict for a car that I can’t compare to the other vehicles in its class, I can say that the 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ is a delightful vehicle that transforms much of what makes Mercedes special into a flagship luxury sedan — but it does feel like the German automaker couldn’t decide what it wanted to do. It tried to combine modern austerity with Benz’s traditional elegance, and it works… but it’s probably not going to work for everyone. It didn’t work for me, but it could very well work for you. And you know what? I respect a delightfully polarizing car.

Advertisement

Image for article titled First Drive: The 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ Is A Beautiful Electric Porpoise

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Image for article titled First Drive: The 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ Is A Beautiful Electric Porpoise

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

For GREAT deals on a new or used Nissan check out Nissan of Queens TODAY!

Tesla’s Latest FSD Beta Doesn’t Seem Ready For Public Use, Which Raises Big Questions

What I like about this test is that it presents a very good mix of everyday, normal driving situations in an environment with a good mix of traffic density, road complexity, lighting conditions, road markings, and more. In short, reality, the same sort of entropy-heavy reality all of us live in and where we expect our machines to work.

There’s a lot that FSD does that’s impressive when you consider that this is an inert mass of steel and rubber and silicon that’s effectively driving on its own through a crowded city. We’ve come a long way since Stanley the Toureg finished the DARPA Challenge back in 2006, and there’s so much to be impressed by.

At the same time, this FSD beta proves to be a pretty shitty driver, at least in this extensive test session.

Anyone arguing that FSD in its latest state drives better than a human is either delusional, high from the fumes of their own raw ardor for Elon Musk or needs to find better-driving humans to hang out with.

FSD drives in a confusing, indecisive way, making all kinds of peculiar snap decisions and generally being hard to read and predict to other drivers around them. Which is a real problem.

Advertisement

Drivers expect a certain baseline of behaviors and reactions from the cars around them. That means there’s not much that’s more dangerous to surrounding traffic than an unpredictable driver, which this machine very much is.

And that’s when it’s driving at least somewhat legally; there are several occasions in this video where traffic laws were actually broken, including two instances of the car attempting to drive the wrong way down a street and into oncoming traffic.

Advertisement

Nope, not great.

In the comments, many people have criticized Kyle, the driver/supervisor, for allowing the car to make terrible driving decisions instead of intervening. The reasoning for this ranges from simple Tesla-fan-rage to the need for disengagements to help the system learn, to concern that by not correcting the mistakes, Kyle is potentially putting people in danger.

Advertisement

They’re also noting that the software is very clearly unfinished and in a beta state, which, is pretty clearly true as well.

These are all reasonable points. Well, the people just knee-jerk shielding Elon’s Works from any scrutiny aren’t reasonable, but the other points are, and they bring up bigger issues.

Advertisement

Specifically, there’s the fundamental question about whether or not it makes sense to test an unfinished self-driving system on public roads, surrounded by people, in or out of other vehicles, that did not agree to participate in any sort of beta testing of any kind.

You could argue that a student driver is a human equivalent of beta testing our brain’s driving software, though when this is done in any official capacity, there’s a professional driving instructor in the car, sometimes with an auxiliary brake pedal, and the car is often marked with a big STUDENT DRIVER warning.

Advertisement

Image for article titled Tesla's Latest FSD Beta Doesn't Seem Ready For Public Use, Which Raises Big Questions

Image: JDT/Tesla/YouTUbe

I’ve proposed the idea of some kind of warning lamp for cars under machine control, and I still think that’s not a bad idea, especially during the transition era we find ourselves in.

Advertisement

Of course, in many states, you can teach your kid to drive on your own without any special permits. That context is quite similar to FSD beta drivers since they don’t have any special training beyond a regular driver’s license (and no, Tesla’s silly Safety Score does not count as special training).

In both cases, you’re dealing with an unsure driver who may not make good decisions, and you may need to take over at a moment’s notice. On an FSD-equipped Tesla (or really any L2-equipped car), taking over should be easy, in that your hands and other limbs should be in position on the car’s controls, ready to take over.

Advertisement

In the case of driving with a kid, this is less easy, though still possible. I know because I was once teaching a girlfriend of the time how to drive and had to take control of a manual old Beetle from the passenger seat. You can do it, but I don’t recommend it.

Of course, when you’re teaching an uncertain human, you’re always very, very aware of the situation and nothing about it would give you a sense of false confidence that could allow your attention to waver. This is a huge problem with Level 2 semi-automated systems, though, and one I’ve discussed at length before.

Advertisement

As far as whether or not the FSB beta needs driver intervention to “learn” about all the dumb things it did wrong, I’m not entirely sure this is true. Tesla has mentioned the ability to learn in “shadow mode” which would eliminate the need for FSD to be active to learn driving behaviors by example.

As far as Kyle’s willingness to let FSD beta make its bad decisions, sure, there are safety risks, but it’s also valuable to see what it does to give an accurate sense of just what the system is capable of. He always stepped in before things got too bad, but I absolutely get that this in no way represents safe driving.

Advertisement

At the same time, showing where the system fails helps users of FSD have a better sense of the capabilities of what they’re using so they can attempt to understand how vigilant they must be.

This is all really tricky, and I’m not sure yet of the best practice solution here.

Advertisement

This also brings up the question of whether Tesla’s goals make sense in regard to what’s known as their Operational Design Domain (ODD), which is just a fancy way of saying “where should I use this?”

Tesla has no restrictions on their ODD, as referenced in this tweet:

Advertisement

This raises a really good point: should Tesla define some sort of ODD?

I get that their end goal is Level 5 full, anywhere, anytime autonomy, a goal that I think is kind of absurd. Full Level 5 is decades and decades away. If Tesla freaks are going to accuse me of literally having blood on my hands for allegedly delaying, somehow, the progress of autonomous driving, then you’d think the smartest move would be to restrict the ODD to areas where the system is known to work better (highways, etc) to allow for more automated deployment sooner.

Advertisement

That would make the goal more Level 4 than 5, but the result would be, hopefully, safer automated vehicle operation, and, eventually, safer driving for everyone.

Trying to make an automated vehicle work everywhere in any condition is an absolutely monumental task, and there’s still so so much work to do. Level 5 systems are probably decades away, at best. Restricted ODD systems may be able to be deployed much sooner, and maybe Tesla should be considering doing that, just like many other AV companies (Waymo, Argo, and so on) are doing.

Advertisement

We’re still in a very early transition period on this path to autonomy, however that turns out. Videos like these, that show real-world behavior of such systems, problems and all, are very valuable, even if we’re still not sure on the ethics of making them.

All I know is that now is the time to question everything, so don’t get bullied by anyone.

Rimac Nevera/Tesla Model S Plaid Drag Race Shows What An Extra 900 Horsepower Is Worth

Rimac Versus Tesla Drag Race Shows What An Extra 900 HP Is Worth

In the first race, the Rimac crossed the line in 8.655 seconds at 166.66 MPH, to the Tesla’s 9.272 seconds at 152.68 MPH. The numbers never strayed far from there. In Race 2, the Nevera hit 8.641 seconds/166.44 MPH versus 9.312 seconds/151.34 MPH for the Model S. In Race 3, it was 8.615 seconds/166.39 MPH Rimac, 9.294 seconds/151.75 MPH Tesla.

Watching the video, both cars start evenly but the Nevera pulls early, and just keeps widening that gap indefinitely until it crosses the line. By the eighth-mile mark, the Rimac was already going about 10 MPH faster than the Model S Plaid during its best run, beating the Tesla to halfway by roughly four tenths.

It makes the Plaid look slow, somehow. These cars are so fast to 60 MPH — Rimac quotes a time of 1.97 seconds for the Nevera — that variability in reaction time can make a huge difference in the overall result, and the drivers say as much. That could explain why the Rimac seems to go a hair faster with every trial as the driver gets acclimated to the car.

So yes, the Nevera is everything Rimac claims it to be, at least in a straight line. That said, this race is a fun reminder of the law of diminishing returns as horsepower relates to real-world performance, and I don’t suspect Plaid owners will want for more go.

We Talked To Jalopnik’s Old Editor-In-Chief About Co-Directing That Pikes Peak Documentary

Illustration for article titled We Talked To Jalopnik's Old Editor-In-Chief About Co-Directing That Pikes Peak Documentary

Screenshot: Screenshot: Pikes Peak: On The Edge

You guys remember Matt Hardigree? He used to run this site and was responsible in one way or another for bringing in some the best stories and writers we’ve ever seen. I spoke with him the other day because apparently he’s a director now, just like Martin Scorsese and James Cameron, more or less.

Advertisement

The film he co-directed with his colleague and longtime friend-of-Jalopnik, J.F. Musial, Pikes Peak: On the Edge, follows six hillclimb entrants through their 2020 runs, chronicling what ended up being a wild year on the mountain. It’s narrated by the brilliant Neko Case and illustrates why Pikes Peak is still one of the most compelling events in motorsport.

The film comes on the heels of 2019’s Apex: The Secret Race Across America, which is one of the best car culture movies I’ve seen. Naturally, I was excited to catch up with Matt and hear about the Pikes Peak project.

Anyway, what follows is that interview, condensed and edited for clarity:


Jalopnik: So, how did you go from being the editor-in-chief of Jalopnik.com to being a film director?

MH: Very slowly then very quickly. I came over to this company called Tangent Vector, which almost no one outside of the industry knows about. It’s the company that created The Drive YouTube channel and sold it. Tangent did Apex: The Story of the Hypercar and Apex: The Secret Race Across America, a bunch of other videos you’ve seen including for Jalopnik, which is how I know them.

I loved them and I loved what they did, so I joined the company to do media consulting type work as well as a little bit of show development. And, it turns out that I really like making videos and film.

Advertisement

It went from, “OK, I’m helping produce The Drive on NBC show with Chris Harris and Mike Spinelli and J.F. Musial, who’s the head of the company and the founder, and then working on producing the Secret Race Across America film. And then I directed a couple of TV episodes and got used to directing, though I was sort of terrible at it, or just learning how to do it.

But then we had this opportunity, through Rob Holland, who’s obviously a Jalopnik contributor and whom everyone loves, to do a Pikes Peak movie.

Advertisement

My thing with J.F. was that if we did the film, if we got somebody to bite on doing it, I would get to co-direct. I couldn’t do it all by myself, but I wanted to learn and I wanted to do it with Pikes. He said sure, if we get it, you can go direct with me.

But then flash forward four months, we had a partner and we had a plan. It went from talking about it to having paperwork signed and working on it in less than six months, which is pretty amazing for this industry. Normally, you come up with an idea, and then you’re lucky if you can do it two or three years later.

Advertisement

Jalopnik: What is it like going from a TV show, you know, a half-hour or hour TV show, to doing like a film? Not like, “ Was it harder?” Like, functionally, what does that entail?

MH: The thing that I completely underestimated having worked on like internet videos before is how much work 22-and-a-half minutes of television is. Making a television show can take four months from pre-production to shooting it. Shooting is the easy part, you can shoot it two days, but getting everything set up and getting it there, and then getting it edited and getting it turned into something is so much work. And I foolishly thought, because I was just learning how to do all of this, that having directed a couple of episodes of television, that it would just be like that, but five times more work. And that was my naivete on display there because it’s really a hundred times more work.

Advertisement

Jalopnik: And I assume it’s harder at Pikes than on a show like Proving Grounds

MH: To make this documentary, we’re following six different racing drivers and teams and their teams, we’re following the organizers of the race. We’re following the official photographer, plus all the other ancillary characters.

Advertisement

And at the end of the day, we’re trying to make sense out of footage from 60 cameras. J.F. and I would just go to his apartment in Jersey City, and we literally just spent weeks just trying to figure out what we had. We didn’t know, because Pikes Peak is a crazy place.

The starting line of Pikes Peak is 9,000 feet into the air. And you can’t communicate across the mountain really, because radio’s really hard. The cell signal is actually a lot better than it used to be, but it’s just an extremely hard place to work. And so much is happening simultaneously that you really can’t get a sense of what happened until after you look at all the footage.

Advertisement

Editing it is just an immense, immense, immense job. Credit J.F., because while I did a lot of it, J.F. was the person who spent literally a week just trying to line up all of the shots into one coherent day, starting at 1:00 in the morning. and running until 3:00 in the afternoon.

Jalopnik: So then, how does this movie compare to what was in your head going in? How similar is this to what you thought it would be?

Advertisement

MH: Yeah. I mean, there’s a quote by Werner Herzog, which to paraphrase is something like, if you make the documentary that you set out to make you failed. I thought was cutesy until I actually did it. Like we knew that we were going to follow some drivers, and we were focused so much on the actual race itself in preproduction, thinking about how we would do it. We knew that we would go to the people’s homes and that because of the pandemic, filming people’s homes, filming with their families would be harder.

Jalopnik: Yeah, you shot this all during the pandemic…

MH: It was fascinating to see so many people’s plans change, or come together at the last minute with the pandemic. We got so many good stories out of that.

Advertisement

I never would have guessed we would have a whole episode just on practice. Practice is important at Pikes because nobody gets to run it during the year. No one’s out there running on Pikes Peak until a couple of weeks before the race.

So you never get to do the full course until race day. And every day, every hour of practice, something happened. I was interviewing Randy Pobst, and I was like, “ Oh, let’s do it after you go do a couple of runs.” And then he goes off to do that run, and he crashes in the most dangerous part of the whole racetrack.

Advertisement

Every day, coming off the mountain — because you’re stuck at whatever part of the mountain you’re on — you’d miss stuff that happened elsewhere. But coming off the mountain, you’d see the carnage, the cars 400 feet off the road in a lake. And you’re like, what the hell happened? And you have to go find a GoPro and you have to go figure it all out. The practice episode is as exciting and as good as the actual race episode.

This was unusual this year, and there isn’t really a good explanation for why, but, this was probably one of the most dangerous, crashy insane events they’ve had a Pikes peak. I’m lucky, really lucky that we were there to capture it.

Advertisement

Jalopnik: So, you were able to piece a lot of that together? How much of that stuff were you able to get in the actual film?

MH: We have a shooter we’ve been using for 10 years, who shot motorsports, who shot the Nürburgring, Le Mans, rally, everything. And he has either a knack or bad luck. He just happens to be there when cars have incidents and accidents. Like if we would set him — and we didn’t even really fully understand this until we got all the footage back, but you know, we had a sense of it as we were shooting — like if we put him up at Engineer’s Corner, somebody was going to have a problem with that corner. And it happened every time, every single time.

Advertisement

Jalopnik: Pikes is a really old event, draws people from all over the world. What’s its place right now?

MH: I think it’s second longest running or continuously running event, depending on how you count it, after the Indy 500. Weirdly, in the United States for the average motorsports enthusiast, I think Pikes Peak is sort of a mid-tier event. It doesn’t rank as high as the Indy 500 or the Daytona 500 or, or, um, you know, 12 Hours of Sebring.

Advertisement

And that’s part of the reason we wanted to do this. Working with the organizers in our pitch to them was, you know, we want to be able to show what’s hard for them to represent. It’s really hard to capture the race cause the place is so big. So one of our goals with this was to make you feel what, what Pikes Peak is like, so you can understand it. Hopefully you’ll care about it more after watching.

In Europe and Japan, it’s actually much more famous. You know Dai Yoshihara? We follow him, he came over here as a drifter and he said, basically his family didn’t understand why he was doing it. But last year he DNF’d at Pikes Peak, and it made all the papers in Japan. And so his parents kind of understood. Because of a bunch of drivers, specifically Monster Tajima, it’s hugely popular in Japan.

Advertisement

Any of my European friends, when I told them I was doing a Pikes Peak documentary, they lost their minds. They love Pikes Peak. They know about it. They knew the history of it. It’s huge for them.

And then for manufacturers, I think that there are only so many places you can, you can win and it feels like it matters forever.

Advertisement

Jalopnik: So now, as far as manufacturers, it seems like the appeal is running an EV there…

MH: It’s so hard on the machines. And, looking forward, I think that the significance of this event will probably be the electric cars. Three of them showed up this year and they were like rock stars.

Advertisement

There were definitely people there who didn’t understand it. Some of the old school open-wheel racers didn’t really understand the electric racers. And there was definitely some tension there.

But when one of the Teslas crashed and it went to go get rebuilt, 14 or 15 people showed up just to see it getting rebuilt and get pictures. People cared more about the Teslas that crashed at Pikes Peak this year than they cared about the car that won. I think that that tells you everything.

Advertisement

And it’s sad, what happened with Randy. I think that Randy could have been close to fastest up the mountain in that Tesla. When it was working, it qualified like second, third, and that car was insanely fast and at the top it should be faster. That Tesla would have shocked the world, a production car winning.

Jalopnik: So if people see this movie, and they love it and they want to get involved, what should they do?

Advertisement

MH: I mean, if you’re crazy, you should go run it. The people who finish it seem to be extremely happy. I’ve had the pleasure of going to the 24 Hours of Le Mans, to Indy, to Daytona 24 to Sebring…I’ve been filming at racetracks for the last three years. Oh, and the Nürburgring 24 a few years ago. I’d say you have to go to four of them. Go to Le Mans, go to Nürburgring, go to the Indy 500 and then go to Pikes Peak. The views are incredible. The air is wonderful. It’s like nothing else, Pikes Peak, the race is incredible. You see the craziest diversity of cars, even crazier than the Nürburgring 24. You’ll see a former Trans-Am Camaro go up before a lightly modified Mazda 3, before a Sierra. And where else are you going to be able to see 4,700 feet of elevation change for a car in your life?

Jalopnik: All right, give me the single most compelling reason for me to watch this film.

Advertisement

MH: So, Jeff Zwart, he’s a photographer and an amazing filmmaker, maybe you’ve had one of his posters on your wall. He is most famous in a racing sense for racing at Pikes Peak. And one of the nice things he said — I think I can repeat this — was that he saw things in our documentary that he had never seen before. Like just parts of the world of that event that he hadn’t seen. And he’s been going there, racing there, for 30 years.

If you’ve never seen it, but you’ve been curious about it, I think this will show you what Pikes Peak can can be. And I think if you’re an expert on Pikes Peak, I think you’ll see something, especially behind the scenes with the access that we had, that you’ve never seen before.

Advertisement

Oh, and also Neko Case is the narrator for it, which is really super cool. She’s a Jalopnik reader, I met her through Jalopnik. I interviewed her nine years ago, I dunno, eight years ago when Middle Cyclone came out. She was awesome and it turns out she was a big car person.

And then I, we were doing this doc and to Motor Trend’s credit, they were like, “don’t give us what we have, give us something different.” Neko had never narrated anything before. She did an awesome job, knocked it out of the park and was so cool.

Advertisement


There are two version of Pikes Peak: On the Edge, a feature documentary edit and a limited series edit. You can catch the series version on Motor Trend On Demand right here.

Tesla Never Really Had Its Heart In The $35,000 Model 3

Illustration for article titled Tesla Never Really Had Its Heart In The $35,000 Model 3

Photo: Getty Images (Getty Images)

I’m old enough to remember when the Tesla Model 3 was supposed to be the affordable Tesla, the one that costs “only” $35,000, except we only ever really saw the $35,000 Model 3 in fits and starts. Now it looks as if Tesla might soon be moving on from the $35,000 Model 3 for good.

Advertisement

First, I must share that today I personally enjoyed reading the headlines and time stamps on the following two Jalopnik stories from last year:

Illustration for article titled Tesla Never Really Had Its Heart In The $35,000 Model 3

Screenshot: Google

Advertisement

Real roller coaster of emotions there. The thing is, the $35,000 Model 3 did eventually appear, though later you had to order it in person at a dealership or call Tesla sold it online only for a brief bit. That Model 3 was a $38,000 Model 3 but “software-limited” to get its price down to $35,000. Some people bought it this way, but when companies start making it actively harder to buy a product it’s a sure sign that said product’s days are probably numbered. That is possibly, in the case of the $35,000 Model 3, because Tesla could be selling it at a loss.

All of which is to say, according to Electrek, the $35,000 Model 3 might soon be a thing of the past.

Sources familiar with the matter told Electrek that Tesla informed its staff that they weren’t allowed to “downgrade” new 2021 Model 3 vehicles to “Standard Range” and sell them for $35,000.

They are still allowed to software-limit features on 2020 Model 3 Standard Range Plus vehicles that are still in inventory and sell those to customers as Model 3 Standard Range for $35,000, but not the new 2021 Model 3, which comes with new features.

Earlier this year, Tesla CEO Elon Musk acknowledged that its cars aren’t affordable enough implicitly including the $35,000 Model 3—saying that it was working on an even cheaper model, a $25,000 compact. Which is still a fair amount of money considering that Tesla buyers no longer get the $7,500 federal tax credit but it is, you know, a start.

It also allows us to move on from the idea that a $35,000 Model 3 was ever particularly affordable in the first place, or that a $35,000 Model 3 would even be particularly desirable, as software-limited as it ended up being. Because if you’re getting a Tesla without all the tech you’re kind of defeating the purpose of getting a Tesla at all.

Advertisement

That means that a $25,000 Tesla with most or all of Tesla’s tech would be a big step forward. But as we’ve learned with Tesla, we’ll just have to watch and wait.

I emailed Tesla for comment and will update this blog if I get a response.

How to Reboot Your Tesla Model 3

Spread the love

Are you interested in learning how to reboot your Tesla Model 3? First, let me tell you a little story…

I had to call tech support from my desk at work a while ago. Our conversation went something like this:

Tech Guy: “Good morning, this is tech support. How can I help you?”

Me: “Good morning. I’m having trouble accessing my network drive.”

Tech Guy: “Okay sir, I can help you with that. Did you try restarting your computer?”

Me: “RESTARTING MY COMPUTER? WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? THE NETWORK DRIVE IS NOT BEING RECOGNIZED? HOW IS IT GOING TO HELP TO RESTART MY COMPUTER?!!!!”

Tech Guy: “Sir, will you please stop screaming and try it.”

Me (after restarting my computer): “That worked, thanks a bunch!”

Cars + Computers

If you’re like me you struggle with computers on a daily basis. Love it or hate it, most cars today have computers integrated into them in some fashion. The Tesla Model 3 is no exception. Tesla is a very unique car company as we mentioned here. Tesla’s Model 3 is somewhat phenomenal in that the touchscreen found in the center console allows the driver to control just about every facet of the car from this device.  Mike Hanley of Cars.com put it this way:

“From its focus exclusively on electric cars to the way it sells and services them, Tesla has charted its own course nearly every step of the way. Knowing that, it’s not surprising that the automaker wouldn’t feel compelled to put a traditional 8- or 10-inch screen in the dashboard of its Model 3 compact luxury sedan. Instead, the Model 3 has a 15-inch touchscreen mounted in front of the dashboard that’s the main interface for most vehicle systems — everything from the direction of the dashboard vents to the navigation system.”

Help! Where’s Tech Support?

So what happens when your system isn’t behaving and you need to reboot your Tesla Model 3? You can call Tesla’s support center at 877-798-3752. Please show them more kindness than I showed my company’s tech dude. You can also try to reboot the system and get things back to normal. When it comes to rebooting your system, there are essentially three options: soft, hard, and what I like to call ludicrous. We here at enrg.io highly recommend that you start with a soft reboot and progress to a hard reboot if that doesn’t work. We will tell you about the ludicrous method but can’t recommend that you try it. As the name suggests, it should only be attempted by the criminally insane…

Soft Reboot

The simplest and easiest reboot is the soft reboot. If the touchscreen in your Model 3 is acting up, or you’re having connectivity problems with your Bluetooth device, try this method. Think of this option as being similar to re-starting your smartphone when it is giving you grief. Follow these steps in order:

  1. Put your car in park.
  2. Hold down the scrolling buttons on your steering wheel. After a few seconds, your touchscreen should turn off.
  3. After a short weight (usually around 30 or 40 seconds) the iconic Tesla emblem will appear on the touchscreen and your home screen will appear automatically.

While you can technically perform this reboot while the car is in operation, it isn’t recommended that you do so. It is always best to stay distraction free while driving and wait until you can find a safe place to park before rebooting.  Although YouTuber “LivingTesla” isn’t able to solve his particular problem in the video below, he does succeed in providing an excellent demonstration on performing a soft reboot in the Model 3. You can check out this video here:

[embedded content]

Hard Reboot

If your issue is not fixed by performing a soft reboot, try a hard reboot. Instead of just restarting the touchscreen, a hard reboot will power down both your touchscreen and the car’s Central Processing Unit (CPU) and then power them up again. Follow these steps to perform this type of reboot:

  1. Put your car in park.
  2. Hold down the scrolling buttons on your steering wheel just as you did with the soft reboot but also depress the brake pedal.
  3. After the touchscreen shuts off, continue to hold down the scrolling buttons and the brake until the Tesla emblem re-appears.
  4. Your car will once again be ready to drive after all systems are turned back on.

Unlike with the soft reboot, this type of reset CANNOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES be performed while the car is in operation. Doing so could cause your car to be disabled, cause a dangerous situation, and make other motorists very angry with you.

Check out this concise and easy to follow videos from Matthew and Rodrigo of the “Electric Gains” YouTube channel for a demo:

[embedded content]

Ludicrous Reboot

If both soft and hard reboots don’t fix the problem, fear not dear readers! There is a third option. Crazy you say? Sure. Just crazy enough to work. The ludicrous reboot is not recommended by Tesla or enrg.io, but it does exist and it is floating around on the web. Because it is already out there, I feel okay writing about it. To perform this reboot follow these steps:

  1. Put your car in park.
  2. Open the front hood and take the cover off of the 12-volt batter that is near the windshield.
  3. Using a 10-mm wrench (yes it must be 10-mm, no other size will do) unhook the cable from the terminal of the 12-volt battery.
  4. Wait 30 seconds and re-attach the cable.

Apparently, this solution was discovered by Tesla mechanics, but Tesla won’t endorse it as a viable option because it involves actually monkeying with the 12-volt battery and they don’t want you doing that. If you’re brave enough to try however, it is guaranteed to completely shut-down and re-start your car. If you’d like a video tutorial on the process, check out this one from YouTuber “Tech Forum:”

[embedded content]

Anyone out there ever have the need to reboot your Tesla Model 3? Did you perform a soft reboot or a hard reboot? Any of you crazy cats ever dare to attempt the ludicrous reboot? Any other tips or ticks you have for getting your car’s computer back up and running? Please leave us a comment and share your thoughts.

Source | Image: Tesla

Source | Videos: LivingTesla, Electric Gains, and Tech Forum via YouTube